How much salary can I expect as a Field Risk Officer in Equitas Small Finance Ltd in Gorakhpur?

You can expect a minimum salary of 0 INR. The salary offered will depend on your skills, experience and performance in the interview.

What is the eligibility criteria to apply for Field Risk Officer in Equitas Small Finance Ltd in Gorakhpur?

The candidate should have completed the required education and people who have 1 to 5 years are eligible to apply for this job. You can apply for more jobs in Gorakhpur to get hired quickly.

Is there any specific skill required for this job?

The candidate should have sound communication skills and sound communication skills for this job.

Who can apply for this job?

Both Male and Female candidates can apply for this job.

Is it a work from home job?

No, it's not a work from home job and can't be done online. You can explore and apply for other work from home jobs in Gorakhpur at apna.

Are there any charges or deposits required while applying for the role or while joining?

No work-related deposit needs to be made during your employment with the company.

How can I apply for this job?

Go to the apna app and apply for this job. Click on the apply button and call HR directly to schedule your interview.

What is the last date to apply?

The last date to apply for this job is . For more details, download apna app and find Full Time jobs in Gorakhpur . Through apna, you can find jobs in 64 cities across India. Join NOW!

Field Risk Officer

Equitas Small Finance Ltd

Field Risk Officer

Equitas Small Finance Ltd

Gorakhpur

Not disclosed

Work from Office

Full Time

Min. 1 year

Job Description

Field Risk Officer

Home

Field Risk Officer
SNO.	OBJECTIVE	WEIGHTAGE	KEY PERFORMANCE INDICATOR	Annexure
1	Adhere to Operational risk process as per the FRO activities check list	50%	% of Incident closed	As per Annexure 1
2	Identification of Spot & Incident reports	20%	% of Gap Identified	As per Annexure 2
3	Quality and Effectiveness of assigned task	20%	% of Effectiveness	As per Annexure 3
4	Self Development	5%	Average Training Mandays	As per annexure 4
5	Process Orientation	5%	Audit Score	As per annexure 5

Annexure - 1
Scoring method	5 (Outstanding)	4 (Excellent)	3 (Very Good)	2 (Good)	1 (Adequate)
% of Achievement	If actual achieved is 120% or above of target	If actual achieved is between 111-120% of target	If actual achieved is between 101-110% of target	If actual achieved is 100% of target	If actual achieved is below 100% of the target

Annexure - 2
Scoring method	5 (Outstanding)	4 (Excellent)	3 (Very Good)	2 (Good)	1 (Adequate)
% of Achievement	No critical audit observations raised by Internal auditors/other audits (ARM/TRM) during FY, which is not reported by FRO/RFRO.	One critical audit observations raised by internal auditors/other audits (ARM/TRM) during FY which is not reported by FRO/RFRO.	2 critical audit observations raised by Internal auditors/other audits (ARM/TRM) during FY which is not reported by FRO/RFRO.	3 critical audit observations raised by Internal auditors/other audits (ARM/TRM) during FY which is not reported by FRO/RFRO.	More than 3 critical audit observations raised by Internal auditors/other audits (TRM/ARM) during FY which is not reported by FRO/RFRO.

Annexure - 3
Scoring method	5 (Outstanding)	4 (Excellent)	3 (Very Good)	2 (Good)	1 (Adequate)
% of Achievement	No compliance related/process gap/ audit queries, raised by Internal auditors/other audits / ARM /TRM during FY.	Not more than 2 compliance related/process gap audit queries raised by Internal auditors/other audits / ARM /TRM during FY.	3 to 4 compliance related/process gap audit queries raised by Internal auditors/other audits / ARM / TRM during FY.	5 to 6 compliance related/process gap audit queries raised by Internal auditors/other audits / ARM /TRM during FY.	More than 6 compliance related/process gap audit queries raised by Internal auditors/other audits / ARM/TRM during FY.

Annexure 4 - Self Development
Scoring method	5 (Outstanding)	4 (Excellent)	3 (Very Good)	2 (Good)	1 (Adequate)
Average Mandays of Training per Team Member	>=3	2.5-2.99	2-2.49	1-1.99	<1

Annexure 5 - Process Orientation
Scoring method	5 (Outstanding)	4 (Excellent)	3 (Very Good)	2 (Good)	1 (Adequate)
Audit Score	>95%	91 - 95%	81-90%	71-80%	<71